Search for: "State v. Prime" Results 1141 - 1160 of 3,301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
  Meanwhile, Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided us with a detailed breakdown of last week’s military commissions hearings in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel has a video preview of New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Yet here was a political leader – on the cusp of becoming Prime Minister – suggesting that the party of appointment would influence judicial decisions. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 12:39 pm by Anushka Limaye
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Tamar Hostovsky Brandes and Idit Shafran Gittleman assessed the Israeli Supreme Court’s decision in Tziam v. the Prime Minister, a case concerning five Palestinian women living in Gaza, who are related to Hamas members and were initially denied permission to enter Jerusalem for medical treatment. [read post]
On Aug. 26, the Israeli Supreme Court, in the case of Tziam v. the Prime Minister, ordered the state to grant the petitioners, five Palestinian women living in Gaza who required life-saving medical treatment, permission to enter East Jerusalem for the purpose of receiving healthcare. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” The Washington Legal Foundation’s On the Merits blog features a debate on the issues in New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Quebec invoked it routinely under the Parti Québécois as a form of political protest, and then notably in 1988, following the Supreme Court of Canada decision Ford v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Matthias Weller
The sales contract was signed on 14 June 1935 by the dealers and the bank, acting on behalf of the State of Prussia whose Prime Minister was Hermann Göring at the time. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am by Jorge Miranda
Chapter Nineteen in the 1994 NAFTA is the direct descendent of Chapter Nineteen in the 1988 Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA).[2] Reportedly, Canada would not have entered into CUSFTA had the United States not agreed to binational panel review, and the adoption of this mechanism required the personal intervention of Canadian Prime Minister Mulroney before President Reagan. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Simply stated, if plaintiff had not pursued the fatally flawed claitns in the Underlying Holdover Proceeding, plaintiff would not have faced any liability whatsoever. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:00 pm by Joe Glantz
While larger and heavier cars may be better for surviving crashes, Consumer Reports states that studies show there are downsides. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 1:29 pm by Ilya Somin
Article V makes our Constitution one of the most difficult to amend in the whole world, possibly even the most difficult. [read post]