Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Nov. 28, 2007) (applying Twombly “plausible on its face” standard in context of fraudulent joinder; denying remand); Taylor v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
Taylor v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
Earlier coverage is in the post, "Cullen v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:53 am
Blount, Informed consent v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
Stitt and Stokeling v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:44 am
In a similar case, State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Portincasa v Taylor, 2022 ABQB 451 (CanLII) [10] The Counterclaim is explicitly based on rights purporting to originate from the “1st Notice”, and that claims to enforce the effect of the “1st Notice”. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
Layoff, preferred lists and reinstatement of public employees of the State as an employer and employees of its political subdivisions and schoolsSource: The Anatomy of a Layoff by Harvey Randall, Esq., Municipal Lawyer, Summer 2009, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207 © 2009 New York State Bar Association. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:19 am
More evidence that courts are tightening up on multi-state FLSA collective actions comes from Vasquez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:48 am
This was the issue in a 1976, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Colonial Savings Association v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:12 pm
Dodd, 111 Wn.2d 174, 178-79, 759 P.2d 455 (1988); Taylor v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
That's the title of Stuart Taylor's current Opening Argument column in National Journal. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Taylor: The case involves what constitutes a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
In Rochester the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, held that PERB abused its discretion when it decided that the City of Rochester committed an improper employer practice in violation of Civil Service Law §209-a(1)(a) (The Taylor Law) by denying city police officers, who were union members, access to union representation during a criminal investigation interview.The Fourth Department said that "PERB abused its discretion in expanding a public employee's rights to… [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
From a Justice Department press release in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm
In the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case Frontiero v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The celebration of two decades of the House of Lords patent biopatent ruling in Biogen v Medeva, hosted by Rouse, is happily recorded on PatLit by Rouseniks Mary Smillie and Catriona Smith. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:06 am
Cleveland State Univ. [read post]
