Search for: "State v. Tech" Results 1141 - 1160 of 5,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The case was filed in the District Court for the District of Maryland on February 18, 2021, entitled Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
The case was filed in the District Court for the District of Maryland on February 18, 2021, entitled Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
People of the State of New York v Griepp 18-2454-cv, a case considering whether an injunction was warranted against several abortion protestors for protests outside an abortion clinic in Queens. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:26 pm by Corynne McSherry
For example, if the stated goal of the proposal is to “rein in Big Tech,” then you must consider whether the plan might actually impede competition from smaller tech companies. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 10:15 am by Karen Gullo
Intangible harms have long been recognized as harms under the law, and Congress and the states must be allowed to pass laws that protect us. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As to the appointing authority exercising discretion in selecting an eligible individual for promotion, while in Matter of Professional, Clerical, Tech. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As to the appointing authority exercising discretion in selecting an eligible individual for promotion, while in Matter of Professional, Clerical, Tech. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:38 am by Dennis Crouch
” = = = = Note: In Synchronoss Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:54 am by Mark MacCarthy
The Safe Tech Act responds, among other things, to the Herrick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Ernesto Falcon
The source of this specter lies not in anyone's crystal ball but in the history of U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 8:23 am by Jayne Ponder
 As Justice Thomas reflected in his recent statement on the denial of certiorari in Malwarebytes, Inc. v. [read post]