Search for: "State v. Twist" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2007, 12:33 pm
Those in the patent realm remember the case of the University of Rochester v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:41 pm by Patricia Salkin
Section 3.1602 states in part that a sign is “dilapidated and deteriorated” when the structural support or frame members are visibly bent, broken, dented, or torn or the sign or its elements are twisted, leaning, or at angles other than those at which it was originally erected (such as may result from being blown or the failure of a structural support ). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm by Sahara Pynes
  Specifically, the standard for investigating harassment claims in California was established in the 1998 case Cotran v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
There is, however, one important twist in the Planned Parenthood case. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Matthew Waxman
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm by Victoria Clark
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck scrutinized the latest twist in Doe v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am by Tara Hofbauer
This news follows a recent ruling in Latif v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:17 am by SHG
Circuit’s decision in Jones v. [read post]