Search for: "State v. York"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 32,728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 6:00 am
In New York Civ. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:00 am
In New York Civ. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:35 pm
Because there is no controlling New York precedent setting the standard and because that standard is an important issue of state law, the Second Circuit certified a question to the New York State Court of Appeals, asking it to decide as follows:What is the standard for finding a defendant liable for punitive damages under the New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:38 am
C. in New York. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm
In the case of Harley v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 1:21 pm
For instance, in State Tax Commission v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 5:45 am
United States and New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:38 am
The Court of Appeals rules that a plaintiff may have a claim under the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws that his former employer discriminated against him because of his perceived sexual orientation. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 am
We have posted about Kramer v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:22 am
The federal government took political, administrative, and procedural cues from the state immigration regimes that predated Chinese Exclusion, particularly those in the influential states of New York and Massachusetts. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:13 am
Richardson, III, LLC v Iron Oak, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 33464(U) September 27, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 651250/2023 Judge: Lyle E. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:41 am
With respect to due process, “[a] non-domiciliary tortfeasor has minimum contacts with the forum State . . . if it purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State” (LaMarca, 95 NY2d at 216 [internal quotations marks and citations omitted]),“thus invoking the benefits and protections of [the forum state’s] laws” (Hanson v Denckla, 357 US 235, 253 [1958]). [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:33 pm
New York v New Jersey is one of those cases. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:35 pm
Wade would send issue back to states. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 6:48 am
The answer is yes.The case is Sutton v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:55 pm
New York State and New York City employment discrimination laws specifically mention these categories, but they do not appear in federal law in so many words. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 1:53 pm
Ruling in the case of People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:16 pm
New York State Urban Development Corp., No. 125 (June 24, 2010). [read post]
