Search for: "Sweet v. Sweet" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am by Richard Goldfarb
  He posits that the lack of any government standard for what is a “sweet” onion allows anyone to label any onion as sweet. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
This can be a heavy burden, particularly where the charge is a grave one, but requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Scott Davies
To read the article and find out who was #1, click here for electronic access (U of A students & staff only) or find it in print in the ABA Journal, v.96, issue 8 (August 2010) – call number K 1 M55872. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The rights and the duties of the Standing Committee, except as provided in the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention, may be prescribed by the Canons of the respective Dioceses.ARTICLE V. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:39 pm by David Lat
A Washington Lawyer Salary Survey Money v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by SHG
This title phrase, glommed from the non-precedential decision of the Third Circuit in State Troopers v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
Moltner's quest for not more than $3 million dollars ended in a sweet and frothy summary judgment. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:31 pm
None of them ran away from their records on trade.The Portman victory is especially sweet, considering that (i) he was a former US Trade Representative during the heyday of G.W. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 4:47 pm
In March 2010, NY Southern District Judge Sweet soured on isolated DNA as unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]