Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2012, 11:29 am
Citing Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Nov. 28, 2007) (applying Twombly “plausible on its face” standard in context of fraudulent joinder; denying remand); Taylor v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
Taylor v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:30 am
Earlier coverage is in the post, "Cullen v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
Stitt and Stokeling v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:53 am
Blount, Informed consent v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:44 am
In a similar case, State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:48 am
This was the issue in a 1976, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Colonial Savings Association v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Portincasa v Taylor, 2022 ABQB 451 (CanLII) [10] The Counterclaim is explicitly based on rights purporting to originate from the “1st Notice”, and that claims to enforce the effect of the “1st Notice”. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
Layoff, preferred lists and reinstatement of public employees of the State as an employer and employees of its political subdivisions and schoolsSource: The Anatomy of a Layoff by Harvey Randall, Esq., Municipal Lawyer, Summer 2009, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207 © 2009 New York State Bar Association. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:19 am
More evidence that courts are tightening up on multi-state FLSA collective actions comes from Vasquez v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:12 pm
Dodd, 111 Wn.2d 174, 178-79, 759 P.2d 455 (1988); Taylor v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
From a Justice Department press release in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
That's the title of Stuart Taylor's current Opening Argument column in National Journal. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Taylor: The case involves what constitutes a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
In Rochester the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, held that PERB abused its discretion when it decided that the City of Rochester committed an improper employer practice in violation of Civil Service Law §209-a(1)(a) (The Taylor Law) by denying city police officers, who were union members, access to union representation during a criminal investigation interview.The Fourth Department said that "PERB abused its discretion in expanding a public employee's rights to… [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:06 am
Cleveland State Univ. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm
In the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case Frontiero v. [read post]
