Search for: "Texas v. United States"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 8,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division held that an arbitration agreement naming the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) as the arbitrator was unenforceable because NAF (now unavailable) was an integral part of the arbitration provision. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:04 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 11:46 am
Hardiman of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit as the moderator. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:58 pm
Perry, the current Texas redistricting case, similar to his intervention in the redistricting case LULAC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:25 am
United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:05 am
United States, 2009 U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 1:02 am
In prosecution of pharmacists for unlawful distribution of controlled substances, admission of portions of the Texas Pharmacy Laws and Regulations (TPLR) "clarify[ied] the scope and contour of criminal laws" and did not substitute a civil regulation for a criminal standard; in reviewing Due Process Claim, there was no plain error in admitting the TPLR evidence, in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
E-3, United States Air Force, Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
Hamdan, individually and doing business as FAH Capital PartnersCase number: 13-cv-00215 (United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas)Case filed: January 29, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 20, 2013 09/20/2013 12/19/2013 2013-79 SEC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:23 am
This post summarizes an opinion issued by the United States Supreme Court on June 15, 2020. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:00 am
If the service occurs in the United States, then only US law is relevant. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:21 pm
" But it was unwilling to make the leap to the "general consuming public," a group it defined as "nearly the entire population of the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 6:32 am
Each Defendant has individually acquired substantial stockholdings in every significant publicly held coal producer in the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 6:32 am
Each Defendant has individually acquired substantial stockholdings in every significant publicly held coal producer in the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:29 am
(NA) Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against Texas in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 11:01 am
The Bush Administration also clashed with states in the recent case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:41 pm
Texas DOT v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 11:44 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
Proc., § 410.10) authorizes California courts to exercise jurisdiction on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of California. [read post]
