Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 6,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The Court crossed that Rubicon when it decided that equal protection did not permit representation to be based on geographic units, such as towns and counties, and did require it to be based on equal numbers of sentient beings (people or voters). [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:21 pm
Jacquelyn Bridgeman (Wyoming) Part Four: Considering the Limits of Loving Black Pluralism in Post-Loving America Taunya Lovell Banks (Maryland) Multiracialism and Reparations: Accounting for Political Blackness Angelique Davis (Seattle) Crossing Borders: Loving v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:10 pm
Stephens v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
Eric Goldman recently singled out this passage in the UMG v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 1:38 pm
The case, Alasaad v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
The case Roache v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:24 am
Corr v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:48 am
People v Blanco, 2009 NY Slip Op 8631, 2009 N.Y. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
R. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
R. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 2:07 pm
” People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 6:12 am
… For most people, Halloween is a fun and silly holiday. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:37 pm
Up to 900 people are poised to sue Cassels Brock & Brockwell LLP following an appeal court ruling certifying a class action against the firm.By overturning a previous order in Lipson v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm
Without referring expressly to the 1977 Act, the judge did just that.The judgment should make it more difficult for people to remove murals from property they do not own - although in practical terms it is surely significant that Banksies, one removed from their original sites, seem to cross the Atlantic pretty quickly to be sold by auction beyond the effective reach of the English courts.As for copyright, Mr Justice Arnold also had no difficulty in recognising that Banksy owned it… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
He also noted that, adecade before Riley, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Government's historical right to search without a warrant people and property crossing the border into the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
(See also, Reilly v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:50 am
People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 10:02 pm
A look at the names of her 277 contributors shows a wide cross-section of the legal community has written checks to her campaign. [read post]
