Search for: "Treat v. Superior Court"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 am
The seminal case of Delaney v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:10 am
Delaney v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
A court, in interpreting a statute, should attempt to effectuate the attempt of the Legislature and is not free to legislate. in Pajak v Pajak, wherein the Court of Appeals held that the right to a divorce is statutorily created and since section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law did not provide for a defense to an action for divorce except upon the grounds of adultery, no defense could be offered to prevent plaintiff's claims of a right to a divorce on the ground of… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:18 am
Ct., Nov. 30, 2007) Recently, San Bernardino Superior Court issued a ruling in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Jarkesy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 8:24 pm
The Court then reaches to a 1988 case Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Lords) (April 25, 2011) ___Cal.App.4th___ (Fourth Dist., G043650). [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 9:28 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
Lundbeck A/S, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petition may not be treated as a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution but may be treated as an application for clarification/directions in the case already decided by this Court, viz., Mr X v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:27 am
The court is surely aware of its own decision in US v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:18 pm
The employees filed a class action lawsuit in Sacramento County Superior Court against Eskaton Properties and California Healthcare Consultants. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:33 am
Supreme Court in Morgan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:48 am
This decision of the Provincial Court may be appealed, by you or the Attorney General, to the Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:07 am
Presumption of IllegalityThe court rejected Polypore’s argument that the Commission should not have applied a presumption of illegality and should not have treated Microporous as an actual competitor. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
The first adopter of the neutral citation was the Superior Courts of British Columbia. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
Similarly, the FDA Law Blog’s post highlights a statement in last week’s United States Supreme Court denial of certiorariin Whitman v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 5:07 am
An additional class action was filed in Massachusetts, and treated by the court as a potential tag-along action, id., at 1 n.2. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:53 pm
Superior Court), the Ninth Circuit's August 17 decision that a class-action waiver in Cinguler Wireless's subscriber agreement was unenforceable under California law (Shroyer v. [read post]
