Search for: "U.S Army Corps of Engineers" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2021, 9:21 am by David Hechler
NotPetya, the most notorious attack engineered by this group, known as Sandworm, victimized dozens of companies and millions of people and caused an estimated $10 billion in damages. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 11:58 am by Ilya Somin
She could declare that climate change is a threat to national security, and use the Army Corps of Engineers and other military agencies to participate in the project. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:30 am by Max Kohn
Investigations would go on to substantiate her claims of contracting fraud in the Army Corps Of Engineers. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Army Corps of Engineers (ACoE), to excavate several mountaintops in West Virginia—the company, a subsidiary of coal giant Arch Coal, Inc., argued that the EPA acted unreasonably by failing to properly consider Mingo Logan’s reliance on the initial permit and failing to explain why the environmental impact of the project was harmful enough to justify revocation, but the court explained that the EPA enjoys “broad veto authority” under the Clean Water… [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
Army Corps of Engineers to consider environmental justice concerns for certain Clean Water Act permits. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Army Corps of Engineers to review the Clean Water Rule, which was issued by those agencies during the Obama Administration with the intent of clarifying the scope of the Clean Water Act and which is currently stayed after a decision by the U.S. [read post]
Army Corps of Engineers to evaluate the impacts of several additional project approvals, including a resource management plan, a conservation plan for the endangered spineflower plant, a streambed alteration agreement, and two permits for the incidental take of protected species. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
Army Corps of EngineersDocket: 10-1059Issue(s): The court of appeals held in this case that land transfers by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to the State of South Dakota pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 did not violate §§ 605(b)(3) and (c)(1)(B) of that Act because they did not include lands within the “external boundaries” of the Yankton Sioux Reservation. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Army Corps of Engineers withdrew an Obama-era proposed rule that would have clarified government policy concerning the use of reservoirs for domestic, municipal, and industrial water supply. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee approved the Water Resources Development Act of 2018, a biennial bill that would authorize the Army Corps of Engineers to maintain the nation’s water infrastructure. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:03 am by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers reduces the agencies' jurisdiction over waters that have been covered under the Clean Water Act since the 1970s -- it fails to protect streams and rivers that have historically been protected under the Clean Water Act, exempting industrial-scale livestock facilities, and allowing streams and rivers to be impounded or filled with toxic coal ash and other waste. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Army Corps of Engineers extended by 30 days the comment period for a proposed rule that would repeal the Clean Water Rule and return to the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) that was in place prior to a 2015 change adopted by both agencies during the Obama Administration. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
Army Corps of Engineers—which denied an easement for the Dakota Access Pipeline in December 2016, pending completion of an Environmental Impact Statement—to expedite review of that pipeline. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:36 pm by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers as "high-risk" to transfer between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins and inflict significant damage to new habitat. [read post]