Search for: "United Engineering, Inc." Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2014, 1:08 am
 Stefano explains:On Friday, Mr Justice Birss delivered a dense, well thought, albeit perhaps slightly unexpected, judgment in Vringo Infrastructure Inc v ZTE (UK) Ltd [2014] EWHC 3924 (Pat). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am by Ronald Mann
For a Court so accustomed to IP disputes involving cutting-edge technologies like software and genetic engineering, B&B Hardware presents a refreshingly old-economy battle involving, I kid you not, bolts. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Crossley, “Case Law, Hamburg District Court: Max Mosley v Google Inc”, online: Inforrm’s Blog” [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:55 am by Kevin
A few "various" cases were explained by a social-media company called "Various, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:15 pm by A. Brian Albritton
”  On October 27 the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York announced that it had filed a Complaint in Intervention in a $100 million qui tam (whistleblower) lawsuit accusing Computer Sciences Corporation, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am by James Goodman
According to the release: Evidence at trial showed that Zhang, 44, of Belmont, California, was employed as a Project Engineer at Netgear Inc., of San Jose, which gave him access to Marvell’s secure database (“Extranet”). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am by James (Jim) A. Goodman
According to the release: Evidence at trial showed that Zhang, 44, of Belmont, California, was employed as a Project Engineer at Netgear Inc., of San Jose, which gave him access to Marvell’s secure database (“Extranet”). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
The Department contracted with Bechtel National, Inc., which subcontracted with URS Energy for work on the project. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:11 pm by Robert Kreisman
Plaintiff engaged the services of an expert structural engineer who testified at trial. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Office of Administrative Hearings of Baltimore County (“OAH”), ruled that appellees, BKL York I LLC, BKL York III LLC, Logwood LLC, Wawa Inc., and Monterey Improvement Association (collectively, “Developers”), were not required to obtain a County Council Resolution (“Resolution”) authorizing the amendment of their Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) plan. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 3:05 am by Ben Vernia
SAIC provides scientific, engineering and other technical services for government and commercial customers and is headquartered in Reston, Virginia [read post]