Search for: "United States v. Baker"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2018, 4:08 am
Miriam Siefert analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Knick v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
” Rusk State Hosp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:24 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Sea Star Line, LLC, 06-606 QP: "Whether the Carmack Amendment applies to the inland leg of a multimodal shipment to a place in the United States from a place in a territory of the United States even if the inland carrier does not issue a separate bill of lading for the inland leg. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Suzanne Prentiss v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 2:43 pm
Missouri State of Missouri, et al., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the… [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
United States The rappers Travis Scott and Drake have been sued for having “incited mayhem” after eight people were killed and dozens injured in a crush during a Texas concert. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
United States Can Co., 131 F. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:30 am
United States, Inc., No. 17-1229 (U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:29 am
City of New York, New York and United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Jane announced that the Fourth Circuit affirmed the 2012 refusal to vacate the sentence in the United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman asks which “volume of United States Reports has the greatest number of canonical or important cases. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Jane posted a summary of two United States Signals Intelligence Directives (USSID) continuing Lawfare’s coverage of the latest ODNI declassification trove. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
., Petitioners v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 11:42 am
Baker v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
United States President Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, is discontinuing his defamation actions against Fusion GPS and Buzzfeed arising out of the infamous “Steele Dossier” Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has a number of posts including: An analysis of the approval of net neutrality laws in California and considers the practical legislative implications. [read post]
