Search for: "United States v. Bell" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2010, 8:09 am by Erin Miller
Florida and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 1:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
UPDATE: Thanks to Hash and Nunzio for one answer: “[W]e think it generally undesirable, where holdings of the Court are not at issue, to dissect the sentences of the United States Reports as though they were the United States Code. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:04 pm
§ 102(b), a patent is invalid as anticipated if "the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country . . . more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:26 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
Right away, it upheld the dismissal of the antitrust claims, which it said were “woefully inadequate” under Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
May 14, 2010)(O'Neill) (civil forfeiture case, truck driver failed to show entitlement to money hidden in truck and unclaimed byowner)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. $281,420.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00158-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-03-08)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.Justice O'Neill delivered the opinion of the Court [pdf]View E-Briefs in No. 08-0465 THE… [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:37 am by Don Cruse
Motion to recuse a Justice denied The orders list also reflects that the Court denied a recusal motion for Justice Wainwright in Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm by Erin Miller
  Perpich united two of the defining commitments in his life:  his allegiance to the Constitution and his experience serving the United States during World War II. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  That list, which was appended to the government’s brief in oppostion in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:22 am by Paul D. Swanson
United States courts have long struggled to differentiate patentable inventions from ordinary innovation. [read post]