Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 9:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 6:08 am
It has been rendered the solemn duty of the Supreme Court of the United States, laid upon it by Congress in pursuance of the Federal Government’s power “[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States,” to decide What Is Golf. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
This is part of a growing generation of cases involving governments in Canada and the United States prosecuting individuals for the contents of the comics that they’re reading. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am
In Riegel v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm
Frum may not have noticed that he is a tapping into a classic episode in United States Constitutional history. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the definition provided by R 26(4), “plant variety” means any plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank, which grouping, irrespective of whether the conditions for the grant of a plant variety right are fully met, can be (a) defined by the expression of the characteristics that results from a given genotype or combination of genotypes, (b) distinguished from any other plant grouping by the expression of at least one of the said characteristics,… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:46 am
National Protest on DOMA—Michael Lehet (Flickr.com) When some constitutionally suspect classifications (race, religion, alienage, or national origin) are not at issue, nor are any fundamental constitutional rights at stake, a law must be upheld if there is any “reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification” (United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:48 am
The controversy led to a series of lawsuits against Microsoft, including United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:26 am
United States continued yesterday. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:44 am
United States was whether farmers who sell their farm while in bankruptcy have to pay capital gains tax to the IRS. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:39 pm
” — this might qualify as either incitement of imminent criminal conduct, or as constitutionally unprotected solicitation of crime (see United States v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:27 am
Anyone who has taught Constitutional Law — like me or the President of the United States — is familiar with the way Chief Justice John Marshall used it in Cohens v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:52 am
Discriminatory failure to investigate and prosecute crimes has been a major problem for victims of sexual assault and violence against women (something the Supreme Court acknowledged, then disregarded, in United States v. [read post]
