Search for: "United States v. Minnesota"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
United States (Case No. 11-318 (Court of Claims)). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm
United States. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
Leading scholars will offer brief reflections on the long history of black freedom movements, their significance to United States history more generally, and their relevance for today. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
At least since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
, Tablet, Feb. 9, 2021, https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/douglass-mackey-ricky-vaughn-memes-first-amendment; Complaint, United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 10:03 am
United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm
” The new filing sought to rely heavily upon the favorable comments that the Supreme Court made about existing same-sex marriages two years ago in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:47 am
In fact, in the June 7, 2012 decision of Fortunato v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 11:46 am
” Yes. * United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:00 pm
Gelfgatt, 11 N.E.3d 605 (Mass. 2014), supporting its decision, but also noted United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:06 am
Farmer, John, and V. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
Nelson (1972), a case pressing the identical claims that are at issue in the Proposition 8 litigation (that denial of a marriage license to a same-sex couple violated federal due process and equal protection requirements), the Supreme Court of the United States dismissed the appeal from the Minnesota Supreme Court “for want of substantial federal question. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:20 am
In Snyder v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Hickman, professor of law at the University of Minnesota Law School, argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in Gundy v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:15 am
The cases came from Minnesota and North Dakota, states where drivers are criminally penalized for refusing to submit to a breath or blood test. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:15 am
The cases came from Minnesota and North Dakota, states where drivers are criminally penalized for refusing to submit to a breath or blood test. [read post]
