Search for: "United States v. Muslim" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
A California District Court upheld a school’s decision to prevent students wearing the flag on their T shirts on Cinco de Mayo (a day of Mexican celebration across the United States when the Mexican flag is often worn). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:59 am by Kevin Jon Heller
  Indeed, the Sixth Circuit specifically held as much in a well-known 1992 case, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am by Eugene Volokh
As it happens, a week before the Florida court decision, an Illinois appellate court handed down a decision in Schneider v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
The other amendments of the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights inspire public adoration and volumes of legal research. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
In its lawsuit, the United States alleged that the school district violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to reasonably accommodate the religious practices of Safoorah Khan, a Muslim teacher at McArthur Middle School. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 8:23 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
In light of these misrepresentations, is there any question — any at all — that the amicus brief cannot be trusted to accurately describe the state of customary international law? [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:44 pm
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees us freedom of religion. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
Ali says she will not stand up for anyone except Allah.UPDATE: Here is the full text of the judge's opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm by Jasmine Joseph
A version of that right is entrenched in the constitutional law of the United States: the right of every human being – again, without exception – not to be subjected to any punishment that is “cruel and unusual”. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
Defendant stated that the discovery he sought was relevant to the issue whether plaintiff's actions caused appreciation to the separate property which should then be included in the marital estate. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:12 am by Jan Neels
Recognition and proprietary consequences of a UK civil partnership in South Africa The decision in AC v CS 2011 2 SA 360... [read post]