Search for: "United States v. One Package" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2018, 1:30 pm by John K. Ross
United States, which presents the Court with a chance to reconsider. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Alexander, No. 07-3219 Denials of a motion to suppress evidence underlying defendant's plea of guilty to drug-related charges, as well as a motion to compel discovery of certain materials, are affirmed over claims that: 1) an officer had no basis for subjecting a package to extra scrutiny at an airport mail facility; 2) although concededly the package would inevitably have been discovered, defendant's alleged beating at the hands of an officer should preclude application… [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
 Given this, U.S. decisions over the use of force are the ones that matte the most–only the United States can project power over long distances for any length of time. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
As discussed in a report produced by the Illinois Local and Organic Food and Farm Task Force for the Illinois General Assembly, "The business of creating and maintaining all the links in the local supply chain--aggregating, processing, packaging, storing, and transporting products--translates into jobs that cannot be outsourced. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:48 pm by Dan
And just to be clear, "in China," for purposes of China's trademark law, does not mean in Hong Kong or in Taiwan or in Macau or in the United States or in Australia or in any other country. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
One of the key aspects of the proposal is that once parental bonds are established in one Member State, these must be automatically recognised everywhere in the EU (for a deeper analysis of the Package, see Tryfonidou; see also Marcia). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am by SHG
United States, allowing exemptions to the exclusionary rule in cases of police negligence). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
He was placed into a restrictive unit in a so-called “dry” cell—one without running water, including for the sink and toilet. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The court rejected defendants’ argument that dismissal was warranted because Moments had consumptive uses which, under United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
In both cases, the Sixth found that no prejudice occurred.The Sixth started last Monday, April 7th, with its opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:28 pm by Tobin Admin
Background On Sunday, December 1, 2019, a mail carrier was working for the United States Postal Service (“USPS”). [read post]