Search for: "United States v. Ready"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,556
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Ellie Wilson brings you the story.CJEU: "Flat-rate" reimbursement for legal fees must cover a significant part of the costs incurred by the successful party In Case C-57/15 United Video Properties, the CJEU held that while Article 14 Enforcement Directive does not prohibit flat-rate reimbursement of legal costs per se, it sets limits on how Member States can set the flat-rate. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
In that prosecution, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had initially refused registration because other financial institutions had already registered loyalt [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 7:24 am
Here is the nuance or clarification made in the Momenta v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 6:58 am
Turning to the Enterprise Act, s.22(1) states that the CMA must refer arrangements or transactions where “(a) a relevant merger situation has been created; and (b) the creation of that situation has resulted, or may be expected to result, in a substantial lessening of competition within any market or markets in the United Kingdom for goods or services. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:43 am
Several weeks ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Rapid Litigation Management LTD v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:59 pm
The “Baigent, Ready” model I summarized before is on the list of possibilities. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
Keep raw meat separate from ready-to-eat foods. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:10 am
Louis Office have a good breakdown of the recent decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 2:37 pm
Applying the two-step framework of Pfaff v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:07 am
Maryland Long ago, back in 1963, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Brady v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 12:50 pm
On June 27, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari to Sequenom, Inc., which will let stand a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that ruled a truly revolutionary medical test to be patent ineligible. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:52 pm
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari to Sequenom, Inc., which will let stand a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that ruled a truly revolutionary medical test to be patent ineligible. [read post]
Symposium: Supreme Court disavows precedent, refusing to protect women from abortion industry abuses
27 Jun 2016, 11:08 am
Burke is Vice President of Legal Affairs for Americans United for Life. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:02 am
Rear end accidents are the most common type of car accident in the United States and for motorcyclists it is not just a fender bender but a cause of severe injury and often death. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians and United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 3:24 pm
United States, according to a top VA official. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am
” Another potential consequence would be ISIS turning to “less conventional military tactics” and inspiring attacks elsewhere including Europe and the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See Duren; State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See Duren; State v. [read post]
