Search for: "United States v. San Francisco"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am
” In United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:39 am
Petersburg to the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 The City of San Diego amended its zoning code to permit cannabis enterprises as a use within a number of zoning districts in the City. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 The City of San Diego amended its zoning code to permit cannabis enterprises as a use within a number of zoning districts in the City. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 16 June / 1 July:US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - San Francisco / New York: (Patent Docs), 17-20 June: US BIO international convention – San Diego: (Patent Docs), 18-20 June / 9-11 July: US PLI: ‘Fundamentals of… [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 2:04 pm
The hiQ v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
” The Court opined that the statutory exemption “endorsed the approach of the First District” in another CEQA “parking impacts” case, San Francisco Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:12 pm
But the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, that limitation in Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Its title is the Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:36 am
We, the jury from the United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 8:06 am
In short, as described by Harlow v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:33 am
"The 18th Amendment had been ratified a year earlier, banning 'the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors' within the United States and its territories. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm
This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.? [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:44 pm
Visit Legal Technology
Law.com ®
10 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petitioners’ reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm
This case involves a 1938 agreement between CalTrans and the federal government, where California would obtain a right of way to build a highway over the Presidio in San Francisco (pictured above). [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
