Search for: "United States v. Stage Co."
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
Sentencing Memo., United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
In its commentary, SBA states that it is clarifying that (1) when a CO requests recertification of size with respect to an order or agreement, the FSS exception does not apply, and (2) if there is a disqualifying size recertification in response to any event in 125.12 (including a merger, sale, or acquisition), the concern must notify the CO for the underlying contract, notify the CO for each existing order, and update its SAM.gov profile to reflect its… [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm
From Hiers v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
In a ruling that appears to be the first of its kind anywhere in the world, Master Harper of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory held that the lawyer could use the social networking site to serve court notices.1 The Facebook profiles showed the co-defendants’ dates of birth, email addresses and ‘friend’ lists and declared the co-defendants to be friends of one another. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
The sole member followed the advice of Skadden and caused the Boardwalk MLP general partner to exercise the call right and acquire all the public units pursuant to a formula in the Partnership Agreement. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:03 am
A little history will help set the stage for the Supreme Court’s opinion: Back in 1985, the Fourth Circuit issued a seminal decision on the effect of rejection, Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:03 am
A little history will help set the stage for the Supreme Court’s opinion: Back in 1985, the Fourth Circuit issued a seminal decision on the effect of rejection, Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:03 am
A little history will help set the stage for the Supreme Court’s opinion: Back in 1985, the Fourth Circuit issued a seminal decision on the effect of rejection, Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
(Pregnancy, according to the judge, is a “normal physiological state” and a “natural process essential to perpetuating human life. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 10:42 pm
No employees sick with symptoms of STEC from PCC Community Markets – West Seattle Co-op were identified. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Kammen invoked Witherspoon v. [read post]
