Search for: "United States v. Younge" Results 1141 - 1160 of 3,944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:15 pm by Robert Litt
” Peter Strzok’s message cannot possibly be construed as levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 10:35 pm
In Elian's case, he arrived in the United States after most of the occupants of the boat, including his mother, died at sea. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:09 am
The vote was 185 to 1 in favor of abolition, and the United States was the lone dissenter. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
IN THE NEWS The United States sued the state of California and California officials over California’s immigration enforcement policies. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am by Andrew King
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:03 am
In all, 2,570 juveniles are serving life-without-parole sentences in the United States, the vast majority for crimes that resulted in someone’s death. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 6:19 am
United States also recommended changes to domestic violence law and policy. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Because states have sovereign immunity only with respect to private lawsuits, not in response to lawsuits by the federal government, the United States does not need to rely on the Young fiction that a suit for an injunction against a state officer is not a suit against the state.Nonetheless, Young’s broader reasoning is highly relevant and undercuts Texas’s position. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Because states have sovereign immunity only with respect to private lawsuits, not in response to lawsuits by the federal government, the United States does not need to rely on the Young fiction that a suit for an injunction against a state officer is not a suit against the state.Nonetheless, Young’s broader reasoning is highly relevant and undercuts Texas’s position. [read post]