Search for: "Urbanic v. Urbanic"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2012, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court case of Terry v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:15 pm
The decisions are Connecticut v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:19 pm
Naughton v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:43 pm
Douglas in Griswold is a perennial favorite, but I think Douglas outdid himself two years earlier in Gray v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 12:38 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:14 pm
In Horne v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:40 am
Brignoni-Ponce and Whren v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:30 pm
Hart In Arcadia Development Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:19 am
Urban Logic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:29 am
In Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:49 pm
Two recent rulings address this topic: CIM Urban Lending GP v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
Hunter v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 11:06 am
In Costa v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
In Vorcheimer v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:23 am
By Eric Goldman United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm
Husain, Department of Housing and Urban Development v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:21 am
Wilson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
The broad approach to the saving provisions is consistent with the similarly broad provisions and interpretation given to similar provisions under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (see Cadogan v Morris (1999) 31 HLR 732) and, insofar as possible, it is clearly desirable for the 1993 Act and the 2002 Act to be consistent (given that the 2002 Act owes much to the drafting of the 1993 Act). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
The broad approach to the saving provisions is consistent with the similarly broad provisions and interpretation given to similar provisions under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (see Cadogan v Morris (1999) 31 HLR 732) and, insofar as possible, it is clearly desirable for the 1993 Act and the 2002 Act to be consistent (given that the 2002 Act owes much to the drafting of the 1993 Act). [read post]