Search for: "VIRGINIA v. MARYLAND"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
Wynne, 13-485, a one-time relist from the Maryland Court of Appeals, thereby extending to eighteen the Court’s streak of relisted grants. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Sheffield v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Virginia, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment bars the execution of the intellectually disabled, but did not define that term. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 7:47 pm
But in 2014, in Hall v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am
What do employers need to know about the Supreme Court’s pregnancy accommodation decision last week in Young v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 428; South Carolina v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
They include California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota and Virginia. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
Accordingly, the WOTUS Rule is now the controlling law in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia and Washington. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
By Jon Katz, a criminal defense lawyer, drug defense lawyer, marijuana defense lawyer, and DWI/ DUI/ Drunk Driving lawyer advocating in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland, and beyond for the best possible results for his clients. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 6:19 am
” (Frew v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
” The lawsuit, New York et al. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:55 am
Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in Young v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
A recent case out of the Eastern District of Virginia federal court in Alexandria, VA gives some insight into the limits of claims under the federal Miller Act. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:42 am
In that case (Alexander v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 10:39 am
The case, Weidman v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:07 pm
Even Justice Scalia has found this option to be constitutionally infirm, arguing in his dissenting opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
A recent case out of the Eastern District of Virginia federal court in Alexandria, VA gives some insight into the limits of claims under the federal Miller Act. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:07 pm
The Supreme Court jump started this issue in January through its work in Hill v. [read post]
