Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 1141 - 1160 of 6,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2012, 12:17 pm
I don't think they ever anticipated that a granddaughter would be involved in this kind of--a victim, in this kind of activity and certainly not a grandfather doing it. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:10 am by SHG
  The defense has no Brady obligation, because we don't prosecute. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:02 am by SHG
  It wasn't a demand. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 10:54 am
Don't want the jury to reach its own judgment? [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 3:18 am by SHG
The obligation persists.Then again, I don't have a logo. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:19 pm by Josh Bell, ACLU
David Sentelle, chief judge of the court, pointed out that federal employees don't have unlimited free speech rights. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 6:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The appellate courts don't like to second-guess juries, even if the plaintiff had a good case. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 11:57 am by Steve Kalar
Hard-fought and creative challenge by Ass’t Federal Defender Rebecca Pennell, Federal Defenders of E. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:12 am
" They don't like it, but I don't care. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 12:20 am
We reported last week that Judge Anne Conway had orally granted summary judgment in the first two test cases in the Seroquel MDL, and that a written order would be forthcoming.We checked the MDL docket last night and didn't see an order, so we told you this morning that the promised written order had not yet been entered.We lied.Judge Conway docketed the order in the individual case, Guinn v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:01 am by Broc Romanek
He also was not persuaded by the argument that the plaintiff shareholders and Sears benefitted from the lawsuit, rejecting their claim that removing the interlocking director from the board eliminated any chance the federal antitrust authorities would file a Section 8 complaint to break up the interlock: We don't get it. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:50 am
Lawyers don't have any obligation to disclose information harmful to their client's position during settlement discussions, the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled today in Hardin v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:32 am by Thomas Surmanski
Furthermore, the approach taken in the Court leaves us with a working test which we, as lawyers, can apply to their own situations, but reassures us that we dont need to balance the needs and rights of our client with the fear of reprimand if we are working from a factual foundation and in good faith. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:18 am by Gary Burger
We don't take a fee for the efforts we take to ensure our clients' bills are taken care of, and consider it a part of our responsibility in representing them. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:28 pm by Elliot Harmon
There are already members of Congress promoting compromised net neutrality bills that won’t give us all of the protections we need. [read post]