Search for: "Wells v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 7:30 am
These are the two programs the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) runs to provide benefits for disabled adults and children who cannot work due to their respective medical conditions. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
Deng maintained that the nature of socialism is to eradicate poverty. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm
Illiberal constraints on privacy and expression do not bode well for discouraging an illiberal political and social agenda. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 6:39 am
In this application, he said he was entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits and Supplemental Security Income (SSI, which is another program administered by the United States Social Security Administration (SSA)). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme Court’s March 1, 2016… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Doing so would hurt only the well-meaning and law-abiding citizens who rely on companies like Apple to protect their data. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm
(slip op. at 6 (citing Darby v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
” The Department of Justice and the Obama administration have joined with the FBI. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:34 am
Colvin, February 4, 2016, United States Court of Appels for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Social Security Disability Claims Process, Jan. 23, 2015, Boston Social Security Disability Insurance Lawyer Blog The post Ash v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
The Joint Chiefs of Staff wrote in a letter to Congress that they will not work with the Obama Administration to transfer remaining Guantánamo prisoners to the United States unless the law prohibiting such transfers is changed. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm
As was stated in Re P(DM) v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
It is now well established that the AFDC program in New York, while administered by local Social Services officials under the supervision of the State Agency, receives up to 75 per cent federal reimbursement and is controlled by federal requirements under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:55 am
While the twenty-six states challenging the initiatives concede that the secretary of Homeland Security has unreviewable discretion to set immigration enforcement priorities (which the Supreme Court affirmed most recently in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 8:04 am
But the statute also provides that an alien who is “lawfully present” in the country is eligible to receive Social Security benefits as well as benefits under the supplemental security income program. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
It is now well established that the AFDC program in New York, while administered by local Social Services officials under the supervision of the State Agency, receives up to 75 per cent federal reimbursement and is controlled by federal requirements under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm
That is the case, now usually called United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
