Search for: "Williams v. Illinois" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2009, 2:18 am
Patent and Trademark Office announced plans to drop controversial proposed patent rules that were challenged in Tafas v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1283 Title: Choose Life Illinois, Incorporated, et al. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois 2009). [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
The Indiana Secretary of State filed a complaint against Aaron V. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
Illinois, and the 1894 decision in Miller v. [read post]