Search for: "Williams v. Office of Public Defender" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 4:43 am
Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s person based on probable cause. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:50 am by Adrian Lurssen
"- From the archive: Comparison of Facebook Privacy Policy versions - April 2010 v Nov 2009 (by William Carleton):"Redline comparison to show differences between Facebook's posted privacy policy, dated April 22, 2010, as against a prior version dated November 19, 2009... [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by INFORRM
EIR 2004, reg 12(5)(e) (confidential information): The Cabinet Office v IC EA/2010/0027. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported in Hunton & Williams' Employment & Labor Perspectives blog: A recent New York state trial court decision, Romano v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:01 am by Larry Ribstein
  I may write about some of those papers when they go public. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm by Mary A. Fischer
  On October 13, a new battle over post-conviction DNA testing begins as the Supreme Court hears arguments in Skinner v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am by Peter Rost
Rost is available to review both plaintiff and defendant cases.Dr. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by INFORRM
  In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
NanceDocket: 09-1115Issue(s): (1) Whether a police officer may be held liable on a claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
” If the Sixth Amendment is your thing (I know it’s mine), Gideon (A Public Defender) advocates improving jury trials by allowing jurors to ask questions in closing argument, and Brian Tannebaum (Criminal Defense Blog) encourages you to complete a survey: A curriculum is being developed by the ABA, NACDL and the Spangenberg Project at George Mason University for an upcoming indigent defense training and technical assistance project funded by the Department of Justice… [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
One could argue that even the choice of twelve as the number of jurors might be sufficiently arbitrary and accidental that some variation would be permitted, see Williams v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The action names as defendants the city of Kingston and four of its policemen: Sergeant Maisenhelder, Officers William Hadsel, Scott Williams and Harry Woltman. [read post]