Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
Case in point: Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Lawrence Knipel’s recent decision in Matter of Lev v Rosenberg, 2019 NY Slip Op 30824(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Mar. 13, 2019]. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Whether petitioners' suit challenging HHS's adjustments is precluded by 42 U. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
In other words, the government's ability to conduct a warrantless follow-up search of this kind is expressly limited by the scope of the initial private search. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm by Susan Brenner
After noting the factual basis for the charges against Davis, the judge outlined the standard of review he was to apply in ruling on her motion for a new trial: A district court, `[u]pon the defendant's motion . . . may vacate any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am by SHG
The Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
In a famous example, an agent of Columbia Pictures sent takedown notices for numerous Vimeo uploads—including the short film that originally inspired Columbia’s Pixels movie—simply for having the word “pixels” in their names.[4] The rights of wrongly accused Internet users, and of those who would read or watch their work, suffer as a result. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by Joshua Matz
” In the New York Times, Steven Greenhouse reports that labor unions have reacted to the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 2:29 am by Marcel Pemsel
The classical understanding of the word requires a physical combination of two parts. [read post]