Search for: "Young v. People"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2025, 11:47 am
Young v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm
Petitioner, who himself was 18 years old, entered into the discussion after one member of the group suggested that the young people present should get more education before expressing their views. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:33 am
State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:47 pm
US v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
Justice Hathaway concurred in Justice Kelly’s dissent, and wrote separately to emphasize consternation at the Court’s failure to adhere to People v Hunter and to contest the evidence that the pilot program, and predeliberation jury discussions generally, enhance a jury’s ability to reach a fair result [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
I've now had a chance to review the complaint in Van Etten v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am
As much as the West has been taught to think of Communist governments as a form of dictatorship which does not represent the people of the country and whose governance of the people is not pursuant to the will of the people, this is not true as a rule and is not true in China today or when after the Communists defeated the Nationalists (just as Fidel Castro came to power with the will of the people). [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Edited by Hilary Young. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
Innumerable children have been born into the cause: innumerable young people have married into it;" and, sadly, the original parties "have died out of it. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 9:15 am
who seek and are bound to find employment fighting other people's wars. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:00 am
The case is State v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:00 am
The case is State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:30 am
In People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 8:09 am
Supreme Court said so in 1968, in Terry v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 8:09 am
Supreme Court said so in 1968, in Terry v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:18 am
Tinker v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
The contents . . . startled [Jacobsen], who . . . expected to receive photographs of `young men 18 years or older.'" U.S. v. [read post]
