Search for: "A,B,C Insurance Companies" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2016, 4:55 pm by comitz
In Part 1, we looked at how insurance companies broadly define mental disorders and substance abuse. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:43 am by Evan Lohr
When any item of the ward’s tangible personal property has a value which when increased by the value of all other tangible personal property previously sold in the estate without a court order would exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) in the current accounting period, a guardian may sell the item only as provided in subdivision (17)b. b. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The jury returned a verdict finding the defendants liable under FIRREA, and the federal district judge imposed civil penalties of $1.27 billion on Countrywide and $1 million on a company executive. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:11 pm by Steven Boutwell
In compliance with the Louisiana Public Works Act, JaRoy furnished a bond to Jefferson Parish with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (“OCIC”) as the surety. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:11 pm by Steven Boutwell
In compliance with the Louisiana Public Works Act, JaRoy furnished a bond to Jefferson Parish with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (“OCIC”) as the surety. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:11 pm by Steven Boutwell
In compliance with the Louisiana Public Works Act, JaRoy furnished a bond to Jefferson Parish with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (“OCIC”) as the surety. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 8:32 am by Barry A. Guryan
”)  Former proposed bills have contained several types of provisions to accomplish this including ones that: a) prohibited the enforcement of all non-competes following California’s approach; b) created presumptions of reasonableness regarding the time and geographic scope; and c) banned the enforcement of non-competes signed by non-exempt and lower paid employees. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 8:32 am by Barry A. Guryan
”)  Former proposed bills have contained several types of provisions to accomplish this including ones that: a) prohibited the enforcement of all non-competes following California’s approach; b) created presumptions of reasonableness regarding the time and geographic scope; and c) banned the enforcement of non-competes signed by non-exempt and lower paid employees. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Patrick McGinnis
Nobody except TDI has a copy, and TDI won’t share it based on some goofy theory of proprietary protection to the anonymous insurance company, who submitted it for approval. [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Current Status: 4/28/2015 - House Ways and Means, (Second Hearing) ORC Sections: 5705.19 HB95 DENTAL INSURERS-NO FEE SCHEDULE (DEVITIS A) To prohibit a health insurer from establishing a fee schedule for dental providers for services that are not covered by any contract or participating provider agreement between the health insurer and the dental provider. [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:44 am by Alan L. Friel and Suchismita Pahi
Although the FCC repeatedly references comments and data from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), its approach to regulating ISPs is an entirely different setup and contains more similarities to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) than to the FTC’s approach to regulating online services. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The E/C raised twelve defenses, including 440.09(4) (intentional acts) and 440.105(4)(b)9. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The E/C raised twelve defenses, including 440.09(4) (intentional acts) and 440.105(4)(b)9. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Customer Cases Customers of the hacked company are the most likely claimants following a cyber-breach. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
.' The TRA as originally enacted provided for a saving or transitional period (IRC 2055(4)(B)(i)(ii)(iii); Reg. 3664--1(g)(1)(i)(ii)(iii)) which is inapplicable to testator, who, petitioners allege at all times was under no mental disability. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
As found by the Federal Court in  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:01 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and other plan sponsors, group health plan fiduciaries and insurers alike should make compliance with the ACA preventive care mandates a priority because violations of the preventive coverage rule not only exposes group health plans and insurers to potential liability for wrongful denial of benefits, breach of fiduciary duty for ERISA covered arrangements and other similar insurance claims for insurers under state law, noncompliance with these mandates… [read post]