Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
Rabiej Leaves The Sedona Conference for Duke Law Center - bit.ly/xOirdg (Brendan McKenna) Keeping Your Outsourced Solution From Becoming A Problem - bit.ly/A61j6J (Joey Seeber, Shaun Yeh) Making The Most Of Delaware’s New eDiscovery Rules: Tips 1-5 - bit.ly/zQXx9T (Daniel Garrie) More Legal Issues about Privacy (and GPS) - bit.ly/xb9Apl (Peter Vogel) NY State Court adopts Zubulake Standard: Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation Triggers… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
The principle espoused by Lord Bingham in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323 should not mean that the domestic courts are bound to a course of inaction. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm
Ever since the notion of an operational duty was first enunciated in Osman v United Kingdom (2000) 29 EHRR 245, it has become something of a judicial mantra that the threshold for establishing a “real and immediate” threat was high (see for example Re Officer L [2007] UKHL 36, and Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681 [41] and [66],). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
However, in the leading case of Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681l , the House of Lords held that a hospital did have an operational duty to take reasonable steps to protect a mental health patient from suicide where that patient was detained under the MHA. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
This could be a recipe for confusion” (Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [22], Lord Nicholls). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
Louis, MO ABA TECHSHOW 2012 March 29-31, 2012 Chicago, IL APRIL ACEDS 2012 Conference April 2 - 4, 2012 Hollywood, FL Hosting and Cloud Transformation Summit – Europe [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:27 am
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35 both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
No. 03:11-633-AC (Jan. 11, 2012). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
ACS State & Local Solutions, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
It was a void agreement because EM's dad clearly knew that she lacked capacity (citing Hart v O'Connor [1985] AC 1000). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
It was a void agreement because EM's dad clearly knew that she lacked capacity (citing Hart v O'Connor [1985] AC 1000). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
They stated that they then immediately contacted the other side.In short, they tried to put the blame on the client and on Counsel.This didn’t get them very far. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
They stated that they then immediately contacted the other side.In short, they tried to put the blame on the client and on Counsel.This didn’t get them very far. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Appeal The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:05 am
Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 pm
No. 03:11-633-AC (Jan. 11, 2012). ... [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm
’" On Wednesday, the Supreme Court held in Maples v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
No. 03:11-633-AC (Jan. 11, 2012). [read post]
