Search for: "Adams v. New York" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2013, 6:09 am by Marissa Miller
Briefly: Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports on a new study which concludes that, although the Roberts Court as a whole is only “slightly more conservative” than the Burger or Rehnquist Courts, the Court’s decisions in business cases have been “far friendlier to business than those of any court since at least World War II. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the argument centered on “whether to cut back the power of administrative agencies, a central goal of the conservative legal movement,” and that “[t]he issue may seem technical, but there was little question that the justices viewed it as momentous. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
Rory Little covered the ruling for this blog; other coverage comes from Adam Liptak of The New York Times and Tara Golshan of Vox, with commentary from Mark Joseph Stern of Slate. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
” The New York Times Company Selects Pixsy to Monitor Image Copyright Globally — “The New York Times Company has selected Pixsy, the legal-tech service for online image protection and copyright enforcement, to monitor the use of New York Times staff-produced images across the internet, ensuring images are correctly used and licensed, that copyrights are protected and enforced, and rights holders are fairly compensated… [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am by Stephen Wermiel
New York, a 1999 dispute over Ellis Island; or New Hampshire v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” In a column in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse suggests that senators ask Gorsuch how he would have voted in Buck v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Tony Mauro at Law.com, Andrew Chung at Reuters and Adam Liptak for The New York Times. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:57 am by James Bickford
Bayer Corp., Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Joshua Matz
  The WSJ Law Blog, the Blog of the Legal Times, The Hill, Reuters (via the Baltimore Sun), and Adam Liptak at the New York Times Prescriptions Blog all provide coverage of these appointments. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 9:02 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Through a summary order, the Second Circuit also upheld a Southern District of New York decision that denied class certification in Wang v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:29 am by Matt Sundquist
At Concurring Opinions, Adam Steinman discusses Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Charlotte Law Library
Adam Liptak of the New York Times reported on November 18, 2011 that the Supreme Court had named 2 lawyers to act as friends of the court and submit briefs and argue points in the health care law case before the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” For the New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[i]n the past, only substantial and sustained monetary help or long-term institutionalization counted, and fewer than 1 percent of applicants were disqualified on public-charge grounds. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “President Trump, who is awaiting word from the Supreme Court on the fate of his travel ban, paid his first visit to the court” for the ceremony. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:51 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
  Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, Jonathan Adler weighs in on Adam Liptak’s article in The New York Times (which Marissa covered in yesterday’s round-up), reporting on a study which characterized the Roberts Court as particularly friendly to business interests. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:05 am by Nabiha Syed
Adam Liptak of the New York Times notes that it “appears almost certain that all nine justices will hear cases challenging the law when they reach the court in ordinary course, probably in the term that starts in October”; on that note, Ilya Shapiro at Cato@Liberty observes that “there does not as yet seem to be a ‘smoking gun’” that would require Justice Kagan to recuse herself. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A-Z on E-Discovery: What Does the Future Hold? [read post]