Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 3,266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:24 am
In 1997, the Superior Court of Los Angeles considered a constitutional challenge to the City of Glendale’s drug policy. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
Carey of Hampden County Superior Court found that the two prosecutors in 2014“tampered with the fair administration of justice” by misrepresenting issues to the court and concealing evidence beneficial to the defense. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Cox sought copies of various taped conversations in the Oval Office, President Nixon, in the so-called Saturday Night Massacre, ordered his attorney general to fire Mr. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 1:56 pm
The Court’s rejection for calls of further flexibility by provincial Attorneys General intervening in the case might give some basis for defence to rejoice. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:21 am
In FTI, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, the justices reversed a state court finding of specific personal jurisdiction over out-of-state plaintiffs in a multistate lawsuit. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
Superior Court of California could hardly surprise anybody who noticed the court’s near-unanimous ruling last month in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Prior to filing a case in the Suffolk Superior Court, which is the court of general jurisdiction for civil personal injury claims in Boston, the case must go before a medical malpractice tribunal. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Prior to filing a case in the Suffolk Superior Court, which is the court of general jurisdiction for civil personal injury claims in Boston, the case must go before a medical malpractice tribunal. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:00 pm
In Merrifield v The Attorney General (2017 ONSC 1333), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice said there is a new, freestanding basis to sue for workplace harassment. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:52 pm
” But claims of executive privilege can be overcome by a compelling government interest in disclosure and, as the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal. 4th 1004, 1040.) [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:38 am
On July 30, 2013, the plaintiff filed a complaint in the Superior Court, alleging strict liability and negligence on the part of the dog owners and unfair claim settlement practices on the part of Vermont Mutual. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
The Court reversed the Kern County Superior Court’s judgment dismissing the action after that court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend based on the asserted res judicata effect on an earlier Alameda County Superior Court judgment. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:00 am
In this case, the California District Court found persuasive the Oregon District Court’s reasoning in Reames v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:00 am
In the ruling, the court cited Jakosalem v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Ruiz agreed to do so, and further argued that, unlike Turner v Safley, it would not be beyond the court’s jurisdiction to order such accommodations. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
As explained by the district court in Nader v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:40 am
” The Missouri Attorney General has authority to promulgate rules under the MMPA. [read post]
