Search for: "Basis International Ltd."
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,809
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2012, 7:45 pm
During their employment, DOL claims company officials threatened and subjected the workers to verbally abusive treatment on an ongoing basis, particularly when they asked about their pay rates. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:06 am
The basis of the rejection was that the defendants did not infringe the trademark rights of the plaintiff. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
Medik had argued, citing Celanese international Corp v BP Chemicals Ltd [1999] RPC 203, that it was entitled to deduct a portion of general overheads - cost of premises and general staff costs. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
The notice requirement, itself, had been confirmed in Frits Loendersloot v George Ballantine & Sons Ltd [1977] ECR I-227. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
M&S, which operated an international chain of retail stores, was running its own highly successful flower delivery service via a website upon which customers could place their orders. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:33 am
The decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Penn-Co Canada (2003) Ltd. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:41 pm
Platy Enterprises Ltd. goes unreferenced, this is one of the leading decision from the Supreme Court of Canada on sexual harassment. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
Petrodel Resources Ltd [“PRL”], one of these companies, owned immovable property in London, as did other group companies [“the Petrodel companies”]. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 6:43 am
On that basis, the insured would be denied recovery if the occurrence is the result of a calculated risk or of a dangerous operation. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:44 pm
PTY Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:38 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. for participating in a conspiracy in the vitamins industry. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 11:27 am
There is therefore no principled basis for excluding insurers from the fiduciary exception. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
Sky sought a stay of the proceedings pending the outcome of an application it had made to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) to have the NOW mark removed from the register. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:54 am
In the first case, EMI (IP) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc [2012] EWHC 1644 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here, the facts were as follows. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
If it is viewed as a conflicts rule, its content would fall to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the courts in decisions in which they would attempt to implement the objectives of order and fairness in the legal system. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
If it is viewed as a conflicts rule, its content would fall to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the courts in decisions in which they would attempt to implement the objectives of order and fairness in the legal system. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
The kiss-and-tell is alive and well. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:00 am
Background The case relates to an application for direction by the administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) Ltd (“LBIE“) in relation to the determination and distribution of client money under Client Assets Sourcebook of the FSA Handbook (“CASS“). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:05 pm
” See footnote 16, (citing Hampshire Group Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
The defendants argued that the claims were HCLCs and moved for dismissal of the suit on the basis that the reports were deficient. [read post]
