Search for: "Born v. State"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 4,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
Court of Appeals v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 2:13 pm
That is what happened in the K.K. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
Thurgood Marshall was born on July 2, 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm
Volokh also wrote that the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
Because whether you're a "child" of the deceased for Social Security purposes depends upon state law. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:45 am
” Image via BritannicaElena was born to a family of academics and lawyers in New York. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
Hence, the Fourteenth Amendment was born in 1868. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am
United States, No. 09-5801, an equal protection challenge to the federal government’s disparate treatment of male and female U.S. citizens for purposes of establishing the citizenship of their children born overseas. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:17 am
Abbott Foothill Communities Coalition v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:51 pm
Updated information on the state of Ohio’s response to the petition in Henry v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:46 am
If the defendant was born in 1963, the defendant could be eligible for relief under the Florida Supreme Court decision in Atwell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 3:47 pm
State, 539 U.S. 510 (2003) and Rompilla v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:00 pm
Upon being informed that none did, he stated that the hearing was closed. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
Golan v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:20 am
Some laws are just too confusing to be broken, or so sayeth the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:09 am
One especially memorable case was Finkel v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:08 am
Supreme Court ruled in Panetti v. [read post]
