Search for: "Born v. State" Results 1161 - 1180 of 4,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2017, 9:46 am by Hanlon Law, PA
If the defendant was born in 1963, the defendant could be eligible for relief under the Florida Supreme Court decision in Atwell v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
  Oh, he's also got another U.S. citizen child at this point, who was born in the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
Screen names like (here) "Cutelagrl93" (i.e., Cute LA Girl Born in 1993) are more accurately "FBIDude67". [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
Updated information on the state of Ohio’s response to the petition in Henry v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm by Scott Bomboy
Volokh also wrote that the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
Because whether you're a "child" of the deceased for Social Security purposes depends upon state law. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by alysondrake
” Image via BritannicaElena was born to a family of academics and lawyers in New York. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:20 am by Kenneth B. Weckstein
Some laws are just too confusing to be broken, or so sayeth the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:35 am by Mark Ashton
It would seem self-evident that a fetus is not a child until born. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
Child was born in 2006 and tested positive for methamphetamine at birth. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Louisiana, this Court upheld state rules borne out of ill-will to minority defendants that allowed the conviction of defendants based upon non-unanimous juries. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:00 am by Madelaine Lane
Although the Court of Appeals opined that the prosecutor’s costs are likely allowable, it stated that it had no way of knowing “the extent to which those costs were based on appropriate charges, such as expert witness fees, People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Upon being informed that none did, he stated that the hearing was closed. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:08 am
Supreme Court ruled in Panetti v. [read post]