Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 1161 - 1180 of 6,951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
“”Administrative State Is THE Leading Threat to Civil Liberties of Our Era'”: Nick Gillespie interview with Philip Hamburger at Reason; Beyond the deference debates: White House Counsel Don McGahn speaks on Chenery I v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The court cited the case of Nixon v US, which involved impeachment but not of president Nixon. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 9:02 am by Bartolus
As a consequence, it was difficult for the state to remedy the situation if the judicial branch committed errors in interpreting EU law. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm by Stephen Gillers
"The reason, the court said in the case of Amnesty International USA v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 7:59 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Administrative Appeals Opinions Body: SC19359 - Persels & Associates, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:44 am by Howard Friedman
As previously reported, last week the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in State of Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
EVEN IF ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSE OCCURRED OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK STATEWhen SW filed a suit against The United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism (USCJ) and others alleging entitlement to damages under the state’s Child Victims Act (CVA), the defendants countered that the claim was barred because the purported sexual abuse occurred in Yellowstone National Park – during a “cross-country bus trip” sponsored by a “branch” entity associated with the USCJ.The… [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied Westbury's motion and Westbury appealed the court's ruling.Citing Shah v Exxis, Inc., 138 AD3d 970, the Appellate Division explained that "[on] a motion pursuant to CPLR §3211(a)(7) to dismiss [an action] for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any… [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Last year, I addressed Piketty.This time around I have written a piece, just posted here, lauding recent scholarship by Michael Knoll, Ruth Mason, and Alan Viard that addresses the legal definition of discrimination against interstate commerce, and that appears to have completely persuaded the Supreme Court majority in the recent state income tax law case, Comptroller v. [read post]