Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 34,263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
Eugene Volokh is a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:45 pm
The Court held that the FAA preempts the ruling of Iskanian v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 12:35 pm
On April 30, 2020, the California Supreme Court (“Court”) ruled on April 30, 2020 that claims brought pursuant to California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and the False Advertising Law (“FAL”) are not entitled to a jury trial. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:56 am
In a post titled Law Professor Sues Over 'Above the Law' Blog Posts , Eric Goldman discusses the case Jones v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 10:00 am
appeared first on California Partition Law Blog. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 2:26 pm
As anticipated, on August 21, 2013, the California Supreme Court granted review and deferred briefing pending its decision in Sanchez v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:04 pm
The post Who Qualifies As “Outside Salesperson” in California appeared first on San Francisco Employment Law Firm Blog. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 8:05 pm
In 1992, a California Court of Appeals, in Winet v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 8:35 pm
In Canales v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:53 pm
In Canales v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
In Arias v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:55 pm
See Bivens v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:08 pm
Blue Shield of California Life & Health Ins. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 9:08 am
In Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:49 am
Authored by:Robert Friedl, Senior CounselCAPSTONE LAW APCThe post DiCarlo v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:23 am
Check out a few of the antitrust treatises available at Jenkins: Antitrust Law by Phillip Areeda and Herbert Hovenkamp, and Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation by Julian O. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:10 pm
Then the California Supreme Court got into the act in Roby v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:55 am
There is no provision of the actual law that states this doesn’t apply to public sector employees – but that’s exactly what the California Fifth Appellate District found in the 2009 case of Johnson v. [read post]
