Search for: "Cook v. Cook" Results 1161 - 1180 of 5,909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 8:52 pm by David Cheifetz
One problem with the use of Cook- I have mentioned this before - is that unless Resurfice purports to overrule the rule in Cook v Lewis, that facts are but-for pattern and the application of the rule produces a finding of factual causation on the balance of probability. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 12:30 am
The first of these, Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated, issued last Friday by the Honourable Mr Justice Kitchin, is a rather more weighty one than the second, Kapur v Comptroller General of Patents, which issued a while ago but has only just appeared on BAILII.The case in Edwards v Cook related to EP(UK) patent 1255510 granted to Cook Biotech. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Florian Mueller
I'll go into more detail on that part in the coming days, subject to whatever else will happen, such as a potential new round of Ericsson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 1:01 pm
 When you find out -- or realize that others are about to find out -- that you've cooked the books for, say, $50 million, go ahead and report that you're conducting an "investigation" into whether the books have been cooked, and make the warning as dire as possible. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
His attorney neglected to bring a direct appeal, although Hardin now claims that it was his desire to do so. 07a0106p.06 2007/03/21 Cook v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 8:37 pm
 Most people have heard of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 am
The following is a little piece by the IPKat's valued friend and colleague, European patent attorney Kevin Cordina (Olswang LLP), who writes: "In Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated a US priority application was filed in the name of three inventors, with the rights from one of those inventors passing to Cook. [read post]