Search for: "Courts v. Campbell" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2015, 3:55 am by INFORRM
The tort of misuse of private information arose as a result of the recognition by the courts that “the values enshrined in Articles 8 and 10 [of the European Convention on Human Rights] are now part of the cause of action for breach of confidence” (Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [17]). [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 5 May 2015 HHJ Moloney QC heard an application for an injunction in the case of Bell v Payne. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:43 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 Even more surprising is the fact that this “mixed result” tag is applied to Campbell v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:43 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 Even more surprising is the fact that this “mixed result” tag is applied to Campbell v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 28 April 2015, there was an application in the case of Bell v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/AoBszeibPT -> LinkedIn’s “Reference Search” Service Doesn’t Violate Fair Credit Reporting Act–Sweet v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
The Court granted cert. in Green v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Court http://t.co/fZaLX9U682 -> Another Privacy Commissioner determination awarding compensation http://t.co/4EdkFDoer9 -> White House unveils cyber pact with Japan http://t.co/uilsQIxgjl -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-04-28 http://t.co/OZ4NgLGFsY -> EU officially ranks cyber crime a top concern http://t.co/BFI44XhMVO -> Re-evaluating Campbell v MGN: Great Promise Unfulfilled http://t.co/DxGVuWVKOL -> Computer and Internet Law… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
It is now over ten years since the landmark decision in Campbell v MGN Ltd ([2004] 2 AC 457) established the misuse of private information (“MOPI”) tort (any lingering doubt that it might not be a tort has been eradicated by the Court of Appeal decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:35 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - An intellectual property attorney for G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC ("G & G") of Campbell, California initiated a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Elsa Valdez and Tikal #2, Inc., both of Indianapolis, Indiana, illegally intercepted and broadcast the Saul Alvarez v. [read post]