Search for: "DONALD v. THE STATE" Results 1161 - 1180 of 4,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am by Eric P. Robinson
This half of video shows Kai Newkirk, a member of the group 99Rise -- which takes credit for the interruption in a press release  -- interrupting the argument to state that the court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am by Eric P. Robinson
This half of video shows Kai Newkirk, a member of the group 99Rise -- which takes credit for the interruption in a press release  -- interrupting the argument to state that the court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:23 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The United States Supreme Court will hear Chiafalo v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the recently-confirmed Solicitor General Donald Verrilli had to decide what to do with the AIA. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:48 am by Dean
Next Thursday, November 5, the seven justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court will sit at the bench behind me to hear the criminal case of State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Rewire.News, Imani Gandy remarks that in Husted v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:39 am by Kalvis Golde
” At the SMU Law Review Forum, Eric Mogilnicki and Alexander Schultz discuss a topic they deem lacking from the debate surrounding New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 10:17 am
" But he's right: https://t.co/bIIdYtvZYw— Donald J. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm by Ilya Somin
As my colleague Michael Greve points out, during the oral argument Solicitor General Donald Verrilli repeated a mistake that has gotten the federal government into trouble in several previous federalism cases, including United States v. [read post]