Search for: "Doe 35" Results 1161 - 1180 of 17,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2013, 1:26 am by Florian Mueller
The ITC staff (which participates in some investigations as a third party and does not make binding decisions) was convinced that the Transform does infringe that patent and asked the Commission to overrule the judge on this one right away. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 11:38 pm by Scott McKeown
The PTAB ultimately determined that thirty claims of the ’115 Patent and twenty-one claims of the ’322 Patent were unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:24 pm by Aaron Barkoff
 When they are, the patent owner alleges that if the ANDA is approved, the ANDA applicant would induce infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:13 am by Dennis Crouch
  The troubling aspect of the memo, however, is that it does not provide any guidance on the Xencor enablement issue. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 7:51 am by Dennis Crouch
 As with other punitive damage regimes – proof sufficient for an award does not necessitate such an award. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 8:33 am
The C&E News article at page 36 mentions "several high-profile scandals in recent years," but does not identify them. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:28 pm
It does not appear as though Bonannee has commented publicly on the federal charges. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Glennon (Tufts University - The Fletcher School) has posted The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression (Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 35, p. 71, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:35 pm by Ben Vernia
The company argued that the qui tam provision of false-marking statute, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 2:21 pm by Gina McAndrew
  While the Court noted there is a statute which permits municipalities with boards or departments of health to enact ordinances pertaining to disease prevention and control, the Court found the City does not have the authority to adopt such an ordinance, as it does not have a department or board of health. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking claim "on the ground that the qui tam provision of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:25 am by Abhinav Chandrachud
The court (pages 35-36) rejects the rationale that wealthy corporations should enjoy diminished first amendment rights on account of their ability to “distort” public opinion. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 Plaintiffs claimed they had been sexually abused over 35 years ago while attending the boarding school that was operated by various Catholic religious orders and organizations. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:44 pm
Unlike loans owned by Fannie and Freddie, the State of Illinois does not purchase loans. [read post]