Search for: "Doe Corporate Entities 1-20" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,679
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
Accordingly, the novelty of the patents was thrown up for determination before the court.Section 1 (2) (a) of the Act states that an invention is new if it does not form part of the state of the art. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm
Ruggie, 28 Jan 2014; A UN Business and Human Rights Treaty Update, 1 May 2014; International Legalization in Business and Human Rights, 11 June 2014. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:03 am by Barry Sookman
The “anti-spam” portion of Canada’s anti-spam/spyware law (CASL) comes into effect on July 1, 2014. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:38 am by Robin Shea
Justice Ginsburg dissented, joined by Justice Sotomayor, and joined by Justices Breyer and Kagan as to all but Part III-C-1 (arguing that for-profit corporations cannot “exercise religion”). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:25 am
Constitutions manifest a community—the aggregation of individuals (or other entities)—that have formed a body corporate. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:21 pm by Jim Butler
There were approximately 532 Regional Centers on June 20, 2014. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
Each state’s statute defines the types of entities subject to their provisions. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
As to the character of the Clippers, there does not appear to be a true 'form of title' applicable, per Marriage of Brooks & Robinson (2008) 169 CA4th 176, 86 CR3d 624. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
If there are multiple Managing Directors the legal entity is represented by each Managing Director insofar as not otherwise provided for in the Articles of Association (Article 2:10 paragraph 1 Corporate Code). [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm by Jani
Software patents are incredibly lucrative, generating an estimated 20 billion dollars yearly to tech giants such as Google and IBM. [read post]
11 May 2014, 5:49 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
” [1] 8 CFR §§214.2(h)(4)(i)(B)(l) and 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(B)(l); 20 CFR §655.700(a)(3) and (b); INA §212(n)(1) [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:29 am by Jack Pringle
For a more complete description of the Vermont district court decision, please see this Corporate Counsel article. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:29 am by Jack Pringle
For a more complete description of the Vermont district court decision, please see this Corporate Counsel article. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:31 pm
However, the Second Circuit in 2010 ruled in Kiobel (2-1 over a vigorous dissent) that corporations could not be liable for violations of international law. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
  Only in an “exceptional” case (not defined) will a corporate defendant be subject to personal jurisdiction beyond the places where it is either:   (1) incorporated, or (2) has its principal place of business. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:28 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Characterisation should be usually made under Czech law (§ 20). [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 7:52 am by Trent Dykes
Currently, long-term capital gains (i.e., gain from the sale or exchange of capital assets held for more than one year) of non-corporate taxpayers are taxed at lower marginal rates (with a maximum of 20 percent) than ordinary income (with a maximum of 39.6 percent). [read post]