Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 1161 - 1180
of 5,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2021, 7:55 am
Nor does the EEOC say anything about state law. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 4:24 am
Of course, Tumblr's position vis a vis Ms. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
Without more, photographs of six third-party teddy bears wearing duffle coats and hats or hoods does not weaken opposer's mark.He disagreed with the majority's conclusion that "Teenie Weenie Bear" is the dominant element of Applicant's mark, instead finding "that the bear design is the dominant element because of the size and placement of name vis-a-vis the design and that, therefore, the name identifies the design. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 pm
The pendulum does not swing back without a little push. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
SEBI does not control and regulate life insurance policies. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 3:58 pm
Titles IV and VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbid discrimination by elementary or secondary education programs run or funded by the federal government. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:13 am
There is no question that these marks are confusing vis-à-vis one another. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
While Dutch Caribbean legislation does not provide a regulatory framework such as a ‘notice-and-take-down'-system as is the case in some other jurisdictions, the obligations of ISPs may be based on general tort law, on specific legislation such as the ordinance on electronic agreements, or on the contract for services vis-à -vis the ISP and the subscriber. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
However, in theory, (possible) obligations may be based on the general law of tort or the contract for services vis-Ã -vis the service provider and the subscriber (customer). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The feature in question related to the portable handheld audio device of the system according to claim 1 as originally filed and further specified that it was adapted to transmit audio data from the portable handheld audio device to the external source. [4.2] In the board’s view, if a feature which has not been searched and which further defines an element which was already part of a claim which had been searched, is taken from the description and added to this claim in order to overcome an… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:37 am
If Judge Mukasey does in fact believe the president can disregard federal statutes in the kind of cases described above, it makes no difference whether the otherwise valid statute is said to "become unconstitutional" in these cases (on the ground that it impinges on Article II) or whether instead the president is simply said to be constitutionally supreme (vis-a-vis Congress) on matters that fall within his commander-in-chief power. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:53 am
If the insured does not have its own counsel to protect against a default, the liability insurer risks not being able to contest the insured's alleged liability and plaintiff's damages if it does not retain counsel to defend its insured and a default judgment is taken while the insurer is investigating coverage. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:44 pm
According to the good professor, no matter how negligent the consumer, does the bank always pay? [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
You also secure an advantage for yourself, vis-à-vis others who may not be able or willing to bribe. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 4:47 am
The Third Circuit has properly recognized that a claim for medical monitoring claim does not lie against the manufacturer of a medical device product. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
It's expected to vote as soon as tomorrow, but before it does, are US companies or workers going to suffer? [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
The ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act, introduced by two Republicans and one Democrat last December, does this in its current form. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
On July 5, a panel of three justices on the Supreme Court of Israel rendered a long-awaited decision in a civil appeal brought against a 2018 district court judgment concerning a tort claim made by a Palestinian residing in Gaza (whose name is not provided in the decision). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:47 am
Patent No. 7,066,383 (“the ‘383 patent); - Count IV: Attempted Monopolization; - Count V: False Advertising under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act; - Count VI: Deceptive Trade Practices under Delaware Law; - Count VII: Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations; - Count VIII: Breach of Settlement Agreement; - Count IX: Cybersquatting under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm
The Act begins by creating a new Title VI for the ADA devoted entirely to consumer facing websites and mobile applications. [read post]
