Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 1161 - 1180 of 8,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2008, 11:00 am
Superior Court (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 225, came to a similar conclusion. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am by The Complex Litigator
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P. 3d 1100 (2005), the court found that the arbitration provision was unconscionable because AT&T had not shown that bilateral arbitration adequately substituted for the deterrent effects of class actions. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Georgia Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tracie Cason's decision last week in Walters v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:31 am
Holding that the penalty imposed “does not shock to our sense of fairness,” -- the standard established by the Court of Appeal in Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d, 222 -- the court dismissed Binford’s petition. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Cranston, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Divisional Court) granted an appeal of summary judgment which found an advance of funds from a mother to her son to have been a gift rather than a loan. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 12:15 am
  The Delaware Supreme Court suggested that the board has such a right in Stroud v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc., No. 18-999 (same); Superior Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 10:40 am
Superior Court (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 549, 552.Doing so, we recognize that the issue is currently before our Supreme Court; that if appellants are so inclined, they can seek review of our decision in that court; and that the ultimate holding in that court may differ from that we make here, perhaps resurrecting appellants’ appeal. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:10 pm by Matt C. Bailey
On September 27, 2010, the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court order denying certification of a Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) claim in Bateman v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 7:42 am by Alex Phipps
The court explained the “trial court first applied the factors outlined in [Daubert v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As such, the court ruled that waivers of liability executed by the students precluded their recovery.In the Superior Court case of Hinkal v. [read post]