Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 7,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
Ameur does not address the key arguments made here. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:46 am
Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision Limitation periods on the commencement of civil actions are governed by statue. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision Limitation periods on the commencement of civil actions are governed by statue. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:04 am
Aaron Byrd and Eric Coombs appealed from a superior court’s order affirming a decision by the Franklin County Board of Adjustment determining that Petitioners could not operate a shooting range on their property without a special use permit that required approval by the County’s Board of Commissioners. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:04 am
Aaron Byrd and Eric Coombs appealed from a superior court’s order affirming a decision by the Franklin County Board of Adjustment determining that Petitioners could not operate a shooting range on their property without a special use permit that required approval by the County’s Board of Commissioners. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
Supreme Court in Marek v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:15 am
The Superior Court of Orange County filed December 4, 2015 the answer is NO! [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:15 am
The Superior Court of Orange County filed December 4, 2015 the answer is NO! [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:27 am
In a decision filed January 26, 2011 (Ceron v. 321 Henderson Receivables), a California Court of Appeals has unanimously affirmed one portion of a California Superior Court judgment sustaining demurrers by J.G. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:23 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled last week in Shera v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
Ultimately, however, he agreed to affirm the Superior Court’s decision. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:26 pm
The Court does not endorse the relocation. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:36 am
And now we have a lengthy Superior Court decision from earlier this summer (Matthews v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 4:10 pm
In Sutter's Place v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:42 am
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court held that, generally, an employer’s duty is to “provide” meal periods; there is no duty to ensure they are taken. [read post]
10 May 2017, 7:49 am
One of the issues on appeal before the SJC in this case was the reliance by the defendants of a United States Supreme Court Case, Florida v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 5:15 pm
Kalinski The California Supreme Court today reversed the Court of Appeal in City of San Jose v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 8:40 am
A recent unpublished case from the court of appeals indicates that it does not. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
”); See also Bufil v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
Superior Court. [read post]
