Search for: "Does 1 - 21" Results 1161 - 1180 of 18,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2021, 2:27 pm by Xandra Kramer
The latest issue (21/1) of the Dutch journal Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht has been published. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:17 pm
For example, an individual who spent exactly 124 days in the US this year and the previous two years would have a total of 187 days under the substantial presence test: This Year: 124 x 1= 124 Last Year: 124 x 1/3= 42 2 Yrs Ago: 124 x 1/6= 21 Total= 187 days. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:17 pm
For example, an individual who spent exactly 124 days in the US this year and the previous two years would have a total of 187 days under the substantial presence test: This Year: 124 x 1= 124 Last Year: 124 x 1/3= 42 2 Yrs Ago: 124 x 1/6= 21 Total= 187 days. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 1:49 pm
Ohio Administrative Code Section 5703-9-21 provides several helpful examples illustrating when the manufacturing operation ends. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:20 am
Does 1-33, brought in Manhattan and targeting Columbia University students, was completely wrong. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:40 am by D. Daxton White
A couple of thoughts on the numbers: (1) Filings for January 2015 are down 21% from the previous year – This is likely a reflection of the upward moving market in 2014 and the fact that the last market correction was back in 2008. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:04 am
Following the Test-Achats ASBL v Conseil des Ministres (Case C-236/09) ruling by the ECJ on 1 March 2011, insurers will no longer be able to use gender as a factor when pricing insurance contracts (see our previous blog here). [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
’ (para 21) The Court’s first point – that Art 8 protects individual reputation – is relevant, but not sufficient to justify extending that protection to companies. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:48 am by James M. Nicholas
Whether creating their own harassment training program or utilizing the DFEH offering, it is important that California employers do not neglect the January 21, 2021 compliance deadline. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 09738-21 Woodcock v Huddersfield Daily Examiner, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09739-21 Woodcock v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigatio 09740-21 Woodcock v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09741-21 Woodcock v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction… [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary SymposiumMark Tushnet  For quite a while I’ve been irritated by the aphorism that “it takes a Theory to beat a Theory” in constitutional law and interpretation.[1]It strikes me as the sort of false profundity that gets thrown around in first-year college dormitories. [read post]