Search for: "Does 1-59" Results 1161 - 1180 of 3,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
    Access the complete 59-page report (click here). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 12:37 pm by Danny O'Brien
A new National Security Law came into effect on July 1 , which provides the authorities with a wide remit to oversee “internet information technology produces and services” that impact national security (Art. 59), as well as maintain “network sovereignty” (Art. 25). [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:40 am by Jon L. Gelman
The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until 11:59 p.m. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:23 pm
Code Annotated Section 59-63 (need rest of cite), the Safe School Climate Act. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:08 pm
  Justice Wiley thinks that Maguire doesn't set forth the rule that the majority thinks it does, and that, instead, cases like Zeitlin v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 11:06 am
  See Pretrial Order #59, In re Cook Medical, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:06 am
It must be held, in line with what the Advocate General stated at points 58 and 59 of his Opinion, that in a case such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is, subject to verification by the referring court, characterised by the loss of distinctive character of the trade mark concerned from the point of view of the end users, that loss may result in the revocation of that trade mark. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:29 pm by Michael O'Hear
  Here’s what I came up with:   District Black Stops (2011) Black Population (2000) Disparity (Percentage Points) 1 25% 9% 16 2 35% 6% 29 3 86% 53% 33 4 89% 50% 39 5 91% 82% 9 6 26% 2% 24 7 89% 59% 30   By way of comparison, about 53% of the New York stops were of blacks, as against an overall 25% of the city’s population, for a disparity of 28 percentage points. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
As argued by the PP, a legal provision for a later non-admittance of previously admitted documents does not appear to exist in the EPO. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It does not depend on [the fact] that the patent specification has been published (see point [6] of the reasons).2. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Harper & James, in their tort treatise, said much the same thing: "conformity to the legislative standard. . .may so clearly constitute due care under the circumstances of any given case that the court will decide it does as a matter of law. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
To that extent, the decision does indeed not comply with R 68(2), first sentence, EPC 1973. [read post]