Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 1161 - 1180 of 3,671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:01 am by Giles Peaker
The parameters of such a duty were summarised in R (Balajigari) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2019) EWCA Civ 673: “First, the obligation on the decision-maker is only to take such steps to inform himself as are reasonable. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:49 pm
It led to a strong judicial slapdown of the Department of Justice by one of our nation's leading jurists, in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:16 am by INFORRM
“Libel Tourism” In response to widely publicised concerns about “foreign” claimants bringing libel cases in England against “foreign” defendants, the draft Defamation Bill at clause 7 proposes that where the defendant is not “domiciled” in either the UK, another EU member state or in a state party to the Lugano Convention, the court would not have jurisdiction to hear the case unless satisfied that “of all the places in… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ds cited public use in England prior to the date of the Scottish patent. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
One such case is Generics [UK] Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Yeda Research And Development Co Ltd and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 925, decided yesterday by a three-man Court of Appeal for England and Wales which consisted of two specialist IP judges -- Lords Justices Kitchin and Floyd -- together with Lord Justice Moses. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but only… [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:53 am
Tom F. nondecision by the United States Supreme Court last October. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
DSD and NVB’s case was supported by a coalition of NGO-interveners all specialising in responding to violence against women (Rape Crisis England and Wales, End Violence against Woman Coalition, Southall Black Sisters, and the Nia Project), as well as Liberty. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 9:29 pm
They were then released, and flown home to England, the petition notes. [read post]
The Clearing House Association, a membership business league comprised of eleven of the largest financial institutions in the United States, is a party to the pending appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Board”) in Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In general, an EU regulation leaves Member States with the discretion to decide whether to create criminal offences in their domestic legislation. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
  There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]