Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
Judgment Warby J considered that Mr Mitchell was domiciled or at least present in England and Wales, and therefore that the English Court had jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
The Court stated that although the Promise Doctrine is viewed as uniquely Canadian, it has its roots in English law in Hatmaker v Joseph ((1919) 36 PRC 231) and Re Alsop's Patent ((1907) 24 RPC 733 - "false suggestion or representation") where, the now extinct doctrine the Court referred to as the "False Promise Doctrine" derived. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
The Court stated that although the Promise Doctrine is viewed as uniquely Canadian, it has its roots in English law in Hatmaker v Joseph ((1919) 36 PRC 231) and Re Alsop's Patent ((1907) 24 RPC 733 - "false suggestion or representation") where, the now extinct doctrine the Court referred to as the "False Promise Doctrine" derived. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:04 am
State. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
(See: Hamilton, para. 37) The Applicant’s factum states, the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 11:33 am
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
On this day 407 years ago, Guy Fawkes attempted a plot against King James I and the English Parliament but was unsuccessful and paid for his actions with his life. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 6:44 pm
The Law Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. has published a report a little while ago about Miranda Warning Equivalents in more than 100 countries around the world.In the United States, so-called Miranda rights are named after the US Supreme Court decision of Miranda v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 11:33 am
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 2:24 am
Contents include: Agora on ISDS and Armed Conflicts Meg Kinnear, Paul Jean Le Cannu & Pierre Nosewicz, ICSID Preface Alain Farhad, Investment Protection in Situations of Armed Conflict: Evolution, Relevance and Challenges Dapo Akande, Armed Conflicts and Investor-State Disputes Samaa Haridi & Vivasvat Dadwal, The Protection of Intangible Property during Armed Conflict Borzu Sabahi & Farshad Rahimi Dizgovin, International Legal Framework Governing Assessment of Damages Caused… [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
H.R. 1149 takes aim at unaccompanied children by weakening their right to counsel, and states that "access to counsel" suffices. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
The American colonies embraced the same approach to abortion as the English common law, and abortion before quickening was both common and legal. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:50 pm
Sam English Grading, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:50 pm
Sam English Grading, Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 7:36 am
Consider State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
In Wright v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:46 pm
The issue before the court in Pulsifer v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
In Goodwin v United Kingdom (2002) the Strasbourg Court held that this inability of the English law to recognise and give effect to a change of gender through gender re-assignment surgery was a violation of a person’s Article 8 rights. [read post]
