Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:38 pm
This issue arose in the Adams v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:01 am
United States, No. 11-1353 (cert. petition filed May 8, 2012). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:41 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:30 am
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:51 am
This week in my Admiralty class I taught my favorite case–Moragne v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
The judge was not impressed, as English is widely spoken in Bangladesh. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am
Michael Bloch QC, for Lucasfilm, urged that the court assert subject-matter jurisdiction and enforce the US copyrights; this was advanced on three bases: 1. in light of the decision in Owusu (C-281/02) the English court is under a duty to accept such jurisdiction; 2. that such jurisdiction in respect of copyright enforcement was in any case established by the Court of Appeal in Pearce v Ove Arup [2000] Ch. 403; or 3. in the absence of compulsory jurisdiction, there remains a… [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
"The Second Circuit held years ago (Haley v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
The case primarily rested on how a skilled person would interpret the sketchy results and conclusions presented in the abstract.An interesting point that arose was whether "the state of the art" was the abstract in Japanese or the English translation of the abstract. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
Hollister appealed arguing that the sum calculated under the normal basis under English law should not have been deducted. [read post]
