Search for: "FLOYD JUSTICE"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
Mandel (1972) and Justice Kennedy’s concurrence in 2015’s Kerry v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Jadwat counters with Justice Kennedy’s plurality opinion in Din, which instructs the courts to consider whether the executive order was issued in bad faith by looking to the evidence, including the President's statements. [read post]
5 May 2017, 10:11 am
Readler of the U.S Justice Department’s Civil Division. [read post]
5 May 2017, 10:11 am
Readler of the U.S Justice Department’s Civil Division. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:30 am
” This is an extraordinary idea, sweeping in its defense of expression in a wide variety of forms and contexts; it is, as legendary First Amendment attorney Floyd Abrams recently noted, “a story of American exceptionalism. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 2:03 pm
Lord Justice Floyd (Court of Appeal) said that the Chancery Division is very interesting. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:30 am
(Here is the latest edition of the Institute for Justice’s weekly Short Circuit newsletter, written by John Ross.) [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 3:52 am
Jane Lambert Court of Appeal Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 266 (12 April 2017) Lords Justices Gross and Floyd and Mr Justice Arnold In Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and Others [2015] EWHC 3366 (Pat) (23 Nov 2015), Unwired Planet sued Huawei, Samsung and Google for patent infringement. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
Lord Justice Floyd, Court of Appeal, LondonDr. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
” Judge Floyd has authorized me to state that he joins in the views expressed herein. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 7:56 am
Floyd, as they joined one of their colleagues on the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
If you do not wish to read all the myriad of decisions, the AmeriKat has re-summarized the 5 year (and then some) war between the companies as follows:Dispute about the jurisdiction of DNIsNovember 2012: Mr Justice Arnold said he had jurisdiction to hear DNIs with respect of the foreign designations of the Lilly patent (see decision here and AdvoKat summary here)May 2013: A Court of Appeal consisting of Lord Justices Kitchin, Lloyd and Longmore upheld Mr… [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:06 am
Copyright © 2007-2017 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
In his opening argument, Texas attorney Jay Floyd made the “worst joke in legal history”: “Mr. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
Lord Justice Floyd observed that the Court of Appeal is now in a good position to obtain the assistance of the parties. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:33 am
It’s a sarcastic snapshot of the juvenile justice system USA circa 1950s. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Just over a year ago, AIPPI hosted a Rapid Response seminar following Mr Justice Arnold finding that the material claims of Warner-Lambert’s patent for the use of pregabalin in the treatment of pain were invalid and in any event not infringed by Actavis’ skinny label pregabalin product Lecaent (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat)). [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:17 am
Lord Justice Floyd did not agree with Luxton that the proceedings were an illicit attempt by FAPL to prevent the use of foreign decoders cards as they were entitled to prevent a domestic card from being used for commercial purposes (nothing to show FAPL would only enforce if foreign domestic). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
Floyd LJ noted that the starting point had to be the language of the claim, which requires a transdermal delivery device comprising a defined active pharmaceutical ingredient in a specific percentage and excipients also in a defined percentage. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
Justice Nicholas easily rejected the false suggestion argument on the evidence, but gave greater attention to utility and sufficiency. [read post]
